
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>marcellus &#187; google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.marcellus.tv/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.marcellus.tv</link>
	<description>the marcellus blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 03:11:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google to buy Brightcove. Not.</title>
		<link>http://blog.marcellus.tv/google-to-buy-brightcove-not/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.marcellus.tv/google-to-buy-brightcove-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Riff Khan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[insight and opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online video industry news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brightcove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.marcellus.tv/?p=290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got my first email at 12:28 pm &#8211; &#8220;rumor: Google to buy Brightcove.&#8221;
I got my second email at 1:07 pm &#8211; &#8220;rumor false: Google to buy Brightcove.&#8221;
I spent the time during those emails scratching my head &#8211; What is wrong with the Brin/Page/Schmidt triumvirate? Does it really make sense for Google to invest in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.marcellus.tv%2Fgoogle-to-buy-brightcove-not%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.marcellus.tv%2Fgoogle-to-buy-brightcove-not%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p>I got my first email at 12:28 pm &#8211; &#8220;rumor: Google to buy Brightcove.&#8221;</p>
<p>I got my second email at 1:07 pm &#8211; &#8220;rumor false: Google to buy Brightcove.&#8221;</p>
<p>I spent the time during those emails scratching my head &#8211; What is wrong with the Brin/Page/Schmidt triumvirate? Does it really make sense for Google to invest in an up-market (at those price points Brightcove is no Walmart) white-label video streaming provider?</p>
<p>Google has an audacious goal &#8211; organize the world&#8217;s information. I guess it does make sense for Google to acquire tools that publish that information&#8230; but Brightcove? Seriously? <a href="http://venturebeat.com/2009/09/16/report-google-to-acquire-brightcove-for-500-to-700-million/">Some reports </a>went on to expand that it would create synergies with Youtube. Um&#8230; you mean the same synergy that Brightcove and Brightcove TV created?</p>
<p>Sometimes the sum of the parts is less than the parts themselves&#8230; what these speculators are missing out on is: the white-label video platform space is different than the UGC video portal space. Publishers in the white-label video have different needs &#8211; they are not looking for platforms that market their content.</p>
<p>They are looking for tools that let them publish, manage and track their content at affordable price points. Then they are looking for a platform that lets them scale up and scale down on-demand. Simply put, IMHO &#8211; Google + Brightcove makes as much sense as Pizza + Ketchup. Sounds exciting for 39 minutes&#8230; and then you wake up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.marcellus.tv/google-to-buy-brightcove-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chrome=Windows, Rebooted. Microsoft=Google, Rebooted.</title>
		<link>http://blog.marcellus.tv/chromewindows-rebooted-microsoftgoogle-rebooted/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.marcellus.tv/chromewindows-rebooted-microsoftgoogle-rebooted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 18:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Preetam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[online video industry news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software plus services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcellusblog.wordpress.com/?p=170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just found this brilliant image at OneComics.

I&#8217;m not sure that Federico Fieni realizes how beautifully he&#8217;s merged art with technology. And art is always open to interpretation, so my interpretation is:

Chrome is the new Windows.
Instead of a PC equipped with an OS + Application stack, you now have a browser equipped with an Internet connection [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.marcellus.tv%2Fchromewindows-rebooted-microsoftgoogle-rebooted%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.marcellus.tv%2Fchromewindows-rebooted-microsoftgoogle-rebooted%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p>Just found this brilliant image at <a href="http://www.onecomics.it/12/09/2008/google-sfida-microsoft-con-chrome/" target="_blank">OneComics</a>.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter" title="MSFT Windows, 2.0" src="http://www.onecomics.it/wp-content/onecomics.it_uploads/2008/09/google-sfida-microsoft-con-chrome-fieni.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure that Federico Fieni realizes how beautifully he&#8217;s merged art with technology. And art is always open to interpretation, so my interpretation is:</p>
<ul>
<li>Chrome is the new Windows.</li>
<li>Instead of a PC equipped with an OS + Application stack, you now have a browser equipped with an Internet connection + web services stack.</li>
<li>The choice of colors (and even the hue of each color) was oh-so-intentional. And I bet that some folks over at Microsoft aren&#8217;t best pleased with this insinuation.</li>
</ul>
<p>But most importantly, this sounds like Google has officially started the war of the worlds. And since all is fair in love and war, will we excuse Google&#8217;s occasional deviances from &#8220;do no evil&#8221;?</p>
<p>Can Google even win this war? To be fair to Microsoft, I loved <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/execmail/2008/10-28nexttechrevolution.mspx" target="_blank">Ballmer&#8217;s recent memo</a> that talked about &#8220;Software plus Services&#8221;- it makes an incredible amount of sense, and Microsoft is definitely very well positioned to push hard at it.</p>
<p>The way I see it, Google&#8217;s plan of baiting Microsoft into the online ads market has failed(through chance, or circumstance), and now Microsoft has $40b extra (maybe less, given where we are today) to invest in this new breed of computing that combines hardware, software, services and cloud infrastructure.</p>
<p>So Google will have to build a really compelling case to convince us that they can take away the Hardware, and the Software, and YET&#8230;build us a dream based on services and the cloud. And as much as I like Google, I think they&#8217;ve already lost the battle. Some veteran strategists at Microsoft have just pulled a <em>very </em>fast one on them.</p>
<p>Microsoft, Rebooted and stronger. Google, Chromed and prettier.</p>
<p>Hm. I&#8217;ve already made my choice. This is no time for pretty.</p>
<p>__________________________</p>
<p>Update: Steve Gilmor just wrote <a href="http://www.techcrunchit.com/2008/11/02/the-battle-for-microsofts-soul/trackback/" target="_blank">a very interesting perspective on this over at TechCrunch</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.marcellus.tv/chromewindows-rebooted-microsoftgoogle-rebooted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chrome is here</title>
		<link>http://blog.marcellus.tv/chrome-is-here/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.marcellus.tv/chrome-is-here/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 04:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Preetam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[online video industry news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcellusblog.wordpress.com/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks slick, and has been engineered beautifully.
 
 
There&#8217;s enough already said about it, but just like a lot of other things, this is worth checking out yourself: http://www.google.com/chrome
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.marcellus.tv%2Fchrome-is-here%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.marcellus.tv%2Fchrome-is-here%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p>Looks slick, and has been engineered beautifully.</p>
<p><a href="http://marcellusblog.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/chromess.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-19" src="http://marcellusblog.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/chromess.jpg?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="145" /></a> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>There&#8217;s enough already said about it, but just like a lot of other things, this is worth checking out yourself: <a href="http://www.google.com/chrome" target="_blank">http://www.google.com/chrome</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.marcellus.tv/chrome-is-here/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

